Community Update

World Pulse Toolkits Available!

At World Pulse, we recognize the need for ongoing learning—for you and for your community! Our toolkits are all available here.

We are especially excited to share our signature Citizen Journalism and Digital Empowerment Curriculum. Start learning today!

Panel Discussion: M&E in Non- and For-Profit Sectors: Differences and Shared Advantages?

Event Date: 
December 13, 2011 - 12:30 - 14:00

M&E in the For-Profit and Non-Profit Sectors: Differences and Shared Advantages

When: Tuesday, December 13, 2011, 12:30 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Where: TBA

USAID and other bodies funding international development work typically engage both for- and non-profit organizations to implement foreign assistance projects but use different contractual vehicles, namely contracts and grants/cooperative agreements, depending on the type of organization. While monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is assumed to be an equally useful and important performance management tool, differences in contracting mechanisms as well as implementing partners’ structural incentives may affect its implementation and utilization over the project life cycle. Additionally, non-profit organizations frequently develop custom monitoring and evaluation tools that are widely disseminated. These tools feature branded methodologies closely associated with the organizations that develop them. What role do these customized tools have in the larger M&E context?
SID Washington’s Monitoring & Evaluation Workgroup is conducting a joint session with M&E practitioners working in the non- and for-profit sectors to share their practical experience and views on the subject. Panelists will hold a discussion structured around the following questions:

What differences in M&E implementation and utilization (if any) result from the different nature of contracting mechanisms employed in the respective sectors? What are advantages and disadvantages?
How is it possible to achieve a consolidated M&E framework in an environment where partners have limited obligations to conform to standardized frameworks and reporting requirements?
How can custom or proprietary frameworks designed by non-profit organizations benefit the for-profit M&E sector?
Are there advantages in having non-profits monitor and/or evaluate work done by for-profits and vice versa?

Mark Bardini, Senior Director, Monitoring and Evaluation, Chemonics International
Thomas Carson, Director, Performance Management, Development & Training Services, Inc. (dTS)
Maria Bina Palmisano, Senior Director, Monitoring and Evaluation, ACDI/VOCA

Moderator: Harry (Hap) Carr, Senior Technical Advisor for Monitoring and Evaluation, Catholic Relief Services (CRS)

Workgroup Co-Chairs:
Tom Carson, Director, Performance Management, Development Training Services (dTS)
Rose Mary Garcia, Independent Consultant

To learn more about the M&E Workgroup, please visit the Ning site.

Please bring your lunch to enjoy during the event.

Register for this event: RSVP for the Monitoring & Evaluation Workgroup Event, December ...

If the RSVP link above does not work, copy and paste the following URL into your web-browser:

For more information:

Contact: Jordana Fraider
Phone: (202) 884-8590

Washington, DC
United States

Magazine »

Read global coverage through women's eyes

Letters to a Better World

Letters to a Better World

Community »

Connect with women on the ground worldwide

shazia @ shiree's picture

BANGLADESH: Finding Fatima

Campaigns »

Be heard at influential forums

WWW: Women Weave the Web

WWW: Women Weave the Web

Programs »

Help us train women citizen journalists

World Pulse Voices of Our Future

World Pulse Voices of Our Future

Blog »

Read the latest from World Pulse headquarters

The Women of World Pulse LIVE: Meet Olanike

The Women of World Pulse LIVE: Meet Olanike

Partners »

Join forces with our wide network of partners

Nobel Women's Initiative

Nobel Women's Initiative