Community Update

World Pulse Toolkits Available!

At World Pulse, we recognize the need for ongoing learning—for you and for your community! Our toolkits are all available here.

We are especially excited to share our signature Citizen Journalism and Digital Empowerment Curriculum. Start learning today!

Punishing a woman for a crime that is not a crime ?

Women2drive campaign

Just as when int’l media outlet’s attention waned on the social issue of women drivers, Shaima, the woman whose lashing sentence was allegedly ‘pardoned by king’ is going to be lashed any way. A sentence handed by those who perceive her action as a social crime. The women driving campaign released a statement concerning the sentence, I am going to quote some sentences from the statement and include my understanding, concomitantly.

Why will she be given the sentence when the king pardoned? The statement says
“King Abdullah's royal decree asked the court to reconsider the sentence. The Interior Ministry refuses to issue a written order to suspend the sentence and only conveyed it orally to Shaima's father. If there is no a written legal document that supersedes this verdict then it will set an example and open the door for many other harsh sentences to take place.” If this is correct, the royal decree was asked to reconsider the sentence not pardon, and without a legal document how come we all thought the sentence will be overturned?

The verdict states “Based on the police report and what the defendant has committed, we consider her acts in shariah law haram "forbidden" as stated in Qura'an: "O you who believe obey Allah, his messenger (Mohammad) and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority" (4:50) She has disobeyed authorities as the Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister, who is in charge of the nation's safety, has issued a banning on women driving based on a fatwa (religious edict) issued by the Ulama to prevent vices. Thus we sentenced her with 10 lashes and made her strongly pledge not to drive again."

Talk about selective evidence! The verdict chooses a Quraan verse randomly and applies to the case in order to justify. As far as I understand, driving a car does not constitute a disobedience to authority, especially when state law does not explicitly say it’s not. When it comes to obedience, for any nation’s progress and safety – it’s imperative to follow the rules but only till the governance body is just, not indifferent to injustice, oppression and ignorant. The sentence itself violates Saudi Basic Law of Governance that clearly states that it’s illegal to punish anyone unless they ‘violate a civil law or Shariah principle’.

Even the ban on driving is lawfully questionable since we are all consciously aware and the statement adds this as well “The former Shoura Council president Sheikh Mohammad Bin Jubair said that the driving ban fatwa was not issued from the Ulama council but from one single sheikh and it was merely a reaction to the women drivers in Riyadh in 1990. He added that "getting in a car with a foreign driver is more dangerous that a woman driving her own car.
We have to emphasize that the Interior Ministry is an executive body that is not eligible of setting and making new laws but only to reinforce existing ones. Thus, the Ministry's statement of banning women from driving which was issued in 1990 can not be considered legally a law nor it sets a precedent, it is merely a statement triggered by a certain incident. Also, the country's Basic Law of Governance was that issued by a royal decree in 1992 it supersedes the Ministry's statement. It states clearly in Article 8 that the "Governance in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia shall be based on justice, shura (consultation) and equality in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah." Need I say more?

Lashing is not unusual in Saudi Arabia, recently a father was sentenced to 2080 lashes and 13yr jail term for violating his daughter. However, I can’t seem to comprehend how is it possible to give a sentence based on the principles of Shariah to a crime that is not a crime according to Shariah (Islamic principles)? It’s not even possible to try her in civil law since it’s not even a crime according to the traffic law in Saudi as the statement says “Until this very day there is not a single legal article that prohibits women from driving. For example, article 33 of the traffic system states that "any person is prohibited from driving car unless a driving license is obtained in accordance of the system, " based on this we believe that the word "person" includes both males and females. In fact, in July 2008 the general manager of the traffic department Major Fahad Saud Al Bisher said to Al Watan newspaper that the newly implied traffic system "doesn't include any article that prohibits women from driving."

These women are attempting to drive in order to make women driving an acceptable norm in society; they are, in fact, helping the government in building up public support to lift the ban. And instead, women are jailed, fined, intimidated and possibly now even lashed.
Recently a news piece reported that Women at Prince Noura Univeristy, the largest women’s university the world, will drive trains for the first time. These trains are designed to transport students within university campus. It appears like women here will pretty much be driving every transportation vehicle except for cars or bikes. (Personally, I would like to ride a bike rather than car)

My heart goes out to Shaima as she will possibly appeal the case. I can empathies with her situation – nobody wants to go to courts and fight with authority, nobody wants to attract attention of the world to local issues. It’s a delicate balance between a responsibility of a citizen and the battle to attain rights of a citizen. Women are half of society, and they raise the other half – how is it we think she’s one half of society only? Women are society. We’re the today, we are the tomorrow – how long will women wait for state to give them the right they already have as Muslim women and should have as citizens?

Downloads

Comments

noreens's picture

Hi Farona, Correct me if I

Hi Farona,

Correct me if I am understanding this wrong, but how can they quote from the Koran? Women driving cars is NOT against Islam. That is the law the "men" there created. The whole thing is ridiculous!!

Noreen

Farona's picture

Disobeying state

As far as all of us understood from the verdict, she is charged with 'disobeying the state' by driving a car. This is the most insanely dubious, unreasonable verdict I have ever came across. It's not all men who are against women driving, it's according to 'some men' who are able to influence quite lot of affairs. No one can sit and watch this happen !

usha kc's picture

My dear Farona, first of all

My dear Farona, first of all thank you so much for raising your voice against such cruel verdict.
Yes, I am also agree with Noreen as she said the rule is created by men.
sista, my thoughts, my strength andmy voice is with you.

I salute your bravery!!!

loves

pawani_rasmus's picture

:)

dear farona,
im happy to see a saudi woman herself write such an article but one major flaw that i noticed is that you keep justifying the koran at every point what i mean is.... even if the kuran bans driving (which supposedly it doesn;t); the ban should not be implemented because as any right thinking person would know, putting a ban on women drivers is totally irrational and what an insane,crazy and fanatic country only could do

regards,
Pawani

Farona's picture

Pawani Thanks for reading,

Pawani

Thanks for reading, appreciate ;- ) I am just an amateur, many Saudi women have been writing about this since years.

The whole post is about interpreting a verdict supposedly passed on religious text. I am not a lawyer nor a law major but to see my fellow brothers using any religion to justify when religion clearly doesn't is a misuse of religious principles and as someone who takes her faith seriously, I felt I had the responsibility to analyze in depth. As you probably have read, the women2drive statement ( the quotation ones) clearly said only one scholar supposedly called for the ban in 1990 not the whole council and interior ministry held up the ban even though it's not the legal body which makes law so there are many legal loopholes in the ban itself from a religious and legal perspective.

Some men find whatever reason to subjugate women, and we, as women will continue to dig into specifics whatever field it may be to decipher facts from fiction. That's what the campaign statement was all about and so was this post. I have been reporting the issue for some time and this is the first time I wrote about the religious context. Some keep providing social, religious,economic reasons to keep ban on place and I perhaps explored all aspects one by one, as much as I understood. For a personal thoughts and experience on the issue, you can read the online magazine piece here on Word pulse!

Okeny-Lucia's picture

Well Said Farona

Hello,
Farona great piece of work here.I see your society in my daily activities of health issues,One women are required to bring forth life,on the other hand they have been left to die painfully deaths during deliveries.My heart goes out to Shaima,she presents a deeply rooted problem that has just refused to go away with time.Thank you for sharing.

Lucia Buyanza
Reproductive Health

Amei's picture

Salaam Farona

This article resonates some of the issues women faces in Maldives as well. I emphathise with Shaima and thank you for sharing this story here.

Have a wonderful day.

With love
Amei

pawani_rasmus's picture

hey farona, i get your point

hey farona,
i get your point now....to make those losers realize how crazy they are , we need to find loopholes in the law made by them themselves. while it is true that the whole ban is absurd; it is difficult to make them understand that., so i guess the first step would be to make them find faults in their own interpretation. thanks for giving me a different perspective even though i still firmly believe that even if the kuran or any other book stops women from anything, it shouldnt be followed.

Magazine »

Read global coverage through women's eyes

Letters to a Better World

Letters to a Better World

Community »

Connect with women on the ground worldwide

PAKISTAN: In the Name of Honor

PAKISTAN: In the Name of Honor

Campaigns »

Be heard at influential forums

WWW: Women Weave the Web

WWW: Women Weave the Web

Programs »

Help us train women citizen journalists

World Pulse Voices of Our Future

World Pulse Voices of Our Future

Blog »

Read the latest from World Pulse headquarters

World Pulse Launches our Inaugural Community Advisory Board!

World Pulse Launches our Inaugural Community Advisory Board!

Partners »

Join forces with our wide network of partners

Nobel Women's Initiative

Nobel Women's Initiative