Elections in Sudan and the Roots of Conflict
By Molly Mayfield Barbee, Peace X Peace Executive Director
It has been just over a year since I left Sudan. So much has changed in my life since then–I survived my first québécois winter, for one thing! But I have continued to follow Sudanese current events . Others of you interested in the region will know that their long-awaited national elections are finally underway this week.
Planned originally to take place in 2003, then postponed pending positive developments from the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in 2005, and postponed again throughout 2007, the Sudanese census–an essential component of national election preparations and a stipulation of the CPA–took place in 2008 and 2009. Difficulties gathering data in Darfur and other regions made the results somewhat difficult to finalize, although a summary with most of the data (except Darfur) can be found here. The presidential elections were slated for the spring of 2009, but as the census was pushed back, so were elections.
It became a kind of sad joke when we were there. Oh yeah, they finally started the census! Great, only two years late. Wonder when they’ll actually hold the elections? No one had much hope that the elections would ever start, let alone be run with appropriate measures so as to be free and fair.
How could a country that couldn’t accurately get a count of its people even begin to hold a credible election? How could some certain percentage of an unknown number of people supposedly make a decision about their national future? Add to that a country without free speech, freedom of the press, political freedom to gather and organize, or other conditions necessary for a free and fair election and the questions become more disconcerting.
But here we are! April, 2010. Better late than never? And better partial and with boycotting opposition parties than not at all? Well… I still think those are open questions. I would love to see your thoughts on the matter in the comments section below.
And what the questions around the Sudanese elections remind me of, on this blindingly sunny spring day in Montreal, is the root cause of the conflict in Sudan. And how, unless larger measures are taken to resolve that underlying conflict, and end how parties are spurring it forward or allowing it to fester and endure these many years, no election will be universally credible in that country. Perhaps even the 2011 referendum–in which so many Sudanese are investing their hope for a free and independent South Sudan and peaceful resolution–will be nearly impossible to finalize until the larger problem is sorted out.
This larger, underlying problem does not belong only to Sudan. It is a transnational, inter-cultural, global problem. It is climate change.
Climate change has been increasing desertification in northeastern Africa over the past 30+ years. This situation has interrupted the traditional movements of nomads in the western region of Sudan into areas historically settled by farmers.
Yes, there are other ethnic conflicts tied to the crisis in Darfur; yes, there is a power struggle going on, both within Darfuri communities and at the national level; yes there are other economic and market-driven catalysts for the larger conflict. But there is a quiet and sometimes not-so-quiet desperation that comes from not having access to water, food, and shelter is being magnified in the broiling hot temperatures and sun of Sudan. This is a problem we all must get involved in together. Caring for the earth means caring for each other. Saving water and natural resources in one location can mean saving lives in another.
So this month, if any are still wondering what the environment has to do with peace, at least let the events in Sudan teach us that the answer to that question is: everything.
Originally posted at Peace X Peace